Showing posts with label culture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label culture. Show all posts

Sunday, September 20, 2009

Youtube and Cultural Memory....

Looking for "gunfighter ballads" I might have forgotten I went over to Youtube to see if there was a video for "The Ballad of Paladin," the theme song to the 1950s-1960s TV western series Have Gun, Will Travel. And, off course there was.

There should be (and quite possibly is already) a name for the Youtube effect in which one thing leads to another, spirals out of control, and before you know it, you're older.

Go on and click on that link to the video of "The Ballad of Paladin." Look to the right and at the list of related videos and how can you NOT click on the opening of Rawhide? Now, how can you resist looking at the opening of The Rifleman? And now you've clicked on the intro to Gunsmoke, haven't you? And Gunsmoke makes you click on the intro to Cheyenne, a series you didn't realize you remembered until the music kicked in.

And as a repository for the theme songs to all the TV westerns of the 1950s and 1960s Youtube has become this instantly accessible repository for that odd sort of affective cultural memory that television theme songs inhabit.

If it hasn't been named then let me suggest we call it the "Youtube spiral."

Cheyenne led to Colt 45 which led to Johnny Yuma which led to Bat Masterson which led to Jim Bowie which led to Shotgun Slade which led to Tombstone Territory and there, at the very end of the spiral, I found Tate.



Tate was a Western television series starring David McLean that aired on the NBC television network from June 8, 1960 until September 14, 1960. It was a summer replacement series as a part of the Kraft Summer Theater, and did not catch on as a regular series.

As soon as I saw the video I instantly remembered the series with a feeling that's hard to describe. It was like forgetting you speak an obscure foreign language until someone mutters a phrase in passing and the memory of it, it's grammar and vocabulary, suddenly come flooding in.

When the series aired I would have been six years old. I'm sure it was never shown in syndication, but 1960 would have been the very center of the golden age of TV westerns and I remember being a fan of all of them. Like every other kid of the era I practiced my fast draw, could "fan" a six-shooter and fire my Winchester air rifle with the best of them.

These memories have to have been what inspired me some years back to buy an Italian-made replica of an 1870s Colt .45 single action revolver. It's my favorite gun to shoot, especially at an outdoor range. I've even learned to "fan" it -- hold the trigger down after the first shot and sweep the palm of your other hand over the hammer of the gun. It hurts like hell by the way, but the thrill is worth it.

But back to Tate....

Like Shane and Paladin, Tate had one name -- a tradition carried on by their 20th Century counterparts, contemporary "guitarslingers" like Prince, Slash, etc. Unlike other TV leading men, Tate had lost the use of his left arm during the Civil War. Afterward, he roamed the West as a bounty hunter/fast gun trying to earn enough money to get his damaged arm surgically repaired. Yes, even in the late-19th Century the lack of national health care often had tragic results.

Tate dressed in black leather with his left arm covered with black leather and slung with a glove on the end. I think it's that I remember; seeing a handicapped figure in a starring role was unusual for TV of the time. it's reasonable to suggest that Tate paved the way for later shows with handicapped lead characters like Ironside and Longstreet.

I've wonder if the character of Tate wasn't informed in some manner by the handicapped WWII veteran, John J. Macreedy, played by Spencer Tracy in the 1955 film, Bad Day At Black Rock. Like Tate, Macreedy faces down the bad guy with just one arm (Tracy keeps his left hand in his pocket the entire film). This fight scene with Earnest Borgnine seems lifted from any one of a thousand classic westerns. Notice how Lee Marvin looks on from a nearby table.



Though short-lived, the series featured a long list of guest stars, including Julie Adams, Chris Alcaide, James Coburn, Robert Culp, Jock Gaynor, Martin Landau, Leonard Nimoy, Warren Oates, and Robert Redford. One episode was even directed by famed actress/director Ida Lupino.

In 2008, The entire 13-episode series was released on DVD by Timeless Media Group, something made possible I suspect because the series is in the public domain. Copyrights that never expire would mean the permanent banishment of who knows how many films and series like this.

One last note.... At the time of the series its star David McLean was already well known as the Marlboro Man, one of the most famous advertising campaigns in advertising history. It would also be one of the most ironic and infamous since McLean himself died of lung cancer in 1995.

Monday, March 2, 2009

Now that's a collection....

In the February-March issue of Book Forum Geoff Nicholson has a short article titled, "Rare Bits & Pieces." My friend on the Expecting Rain discussion forum, "The Revelator," knowing that I am more than fond of the author, Richard Brautigan, sent me the link to Nicholson's article because in the amazing book collection he describes is perhaps the most perfect piece of Brautigan ephemera, ever: the author's 1970 Texas fishing license. Above my own small collection of Brautigan first editions is my one piece of Brautigan ephemera, a framed invitation from Grove Press to the reception celebrating the publication of his first novel, A Confederate General From Big Sur.

Nicholson's article is so much fun that, even though you can read it by clicking the link in the first sentence above, I'm going to post the whole thing below with the hope that neither he nor Book Forum object:

Rare Bits & Pieces
Artist richard prince has amassed an idiosyncratic collection of first editions and literary curios.
By Geoff Nicholson


If by some chance you happen to be passing through Rensselaerville, a formerly wealthy, now eerily becalmed, mill town in far upstate New York, you might possibly notice a neat, substantial, brick-built house at the center of town. It’s elegantly austere, nineteenth-century, with two doors and six windows symmetrically arranged on the front, and on the side is one of those plaques telling you how far you are from other places in the world: 29 miles from Catskill, 262 from Montreal, and 2,358 from Panama.

It would be a uniquely alert traveler who’d see that plaque and immediately think, “Ah yes, Panama, the Canal Zone, allegedly the birthplace of artist, appropriator, photographer (indeed rephotographer), and all-round provocateur Richard Prince. This must be the building where he keeps his rare-book collection.” But that’s exactly what it is.

A cursory acquaintance with Prince’s art might not suggest he’s the most bookish of artists. His iconography features Marlboro men, cowboys (clothed and naked), nurses (ditto), “girlfriend” imagery from biker magazines, hoods from muscle cars, sometimes muscle cars themselves. His latest works feature doctored photographs of Rastamen and big-breasted women. It’s not exactly Virginia Woolf territory. And yet, and yet.

There have always been clues about Prince’s literary side. The artist’s books and catalogues he’s produced demonstrate a bibliophilia not shared by all visual artists. Photographs have appeared in some of them showing neat stacks of books, like the one in his 2004 publication Man of a dozen or so volumes, all first editions, paperbacks by Charles Willeford and Rudolph Wurlitzer on top, hardbacks by Don DeLillo and Richard Price at the bottom.

Prince has also produced some quirky literary texts. A 1985 piece, published in ZG magazine, is a conspicuously faked, yet very knowing, interview with J. G. Ballard, the gimmick being that the older, more established Ballard is the one asking all the questions. A few years later, in the terrific essay “Bringing It All Back Home,” Prince describes his feelings about collecting, presenting himself as a New York flaneur, energetically seeking out and buying books, some of them rare and valuable, some not, though his preference is evidently for the former. “I want the best copy,” he writes. “The only copy. The most expensive copy. . . . I want the copy that is rarer than anyone had previously dreamed of. I want the copy that dreams.”

These days, as I discovered when I met up with him in Rensselaerville, Prince is able to get exactly what he wants. When he bought Brigid Berlin’s legendary but little-seen, and indeed unpublished, Cock Book for $175,000, in 2005, the acquisition was reported as both gossip and art-world news.

To visit the Prince Library is a pleasure and a privilege and also something of a rarity. Prince explained that he didn’t bring many people there. “Most people just aren’t that interested in books,” he said uncomplainingly. “It’s like a gentleman’s club with only one member.” About once a week, he drives the few miles from his house to the library and sits alone there, enjoying his collection, examining (to take examples more or less at random) his copy of The Colossus inscribed by Sylvia Plath to Ted Hughes, complete with a little heart drawn next to his name, or a first edition of Jack Smith’s The Beautiful Book (Dead Language Press, 1962), one of two hundred, with nineteen tipped-in photographs; a copy sold at auction for a little over $34,000 last year.

Prince says he doesn’t imagine there are any local bad elements planning a heist, but even so there’s a serious security system, and within the house is a sanctum sanctorum, a room-size, walk-in fireproof safe where the truly irreplaceable treasures live. It comes as no surprise to discover that the interior of the building is laid out like a very fine exhibition space. The place is uncluttered, the collection and the visitor are given room to breathe, yet the moment you enter you’re in no doubt that you’re surrounded by wonders.

Yes, those are Diane Arbus photographs, uneditioned ones she made herself, essentially contact prints. Yes, that crash helmet with the fabulous psychedelic paint job is signed by Mountain Girl, Ken Babbs, and Ken Kesey. There on the wall is a check from the Security National Bank of Northport, New York, made out from Jack Kerouac to Allen Ginsberg for $40, dated 1960. It’s been framed alongside a wire report of Kerouac’s death and a photograph, and of course these fugitive bits of literary ephemera have become a Prince artwork.

Prince is a conceptualist, and he originally conceived that his collection would cover the period from 1949, the year of his birth and also of the publication of Orwell’s 1984, to the actual year 1984. Neat—perhaps a little too neat. Like many collecting schemes, the boundaries got distorted: acquiring a full set of Black Mask magazine extended it into the past, as did buying a first edition of Ulysses (one of one hundred signed copies, Shakespeare & Co., 1922). Nevertheless, ’49 to ’84 is an “interesting time” for those intrigued by counterculture in its broadest sense: not just the Beats but also the hippies; not just Kesey and Leary but Nabokov and Heller and Pynchon; not just Warhol but also Zap Comix. “I paid $15,000 for Zap, volume 1, number 1,” Prince said. “People thought I was insane.” Then he added, “Basically, my collection is about sex, drugs, Beats, hippies, punks.” Imagine a long, thoughtful pause here. “And great reads.”

The less precious items in the collection are “open access,” on shelves, in cabinets, sometimes arranged into miniature shrines; a frieze of multiple editions of Lolita in many languages, an accumulation of Richard Brautigan publications along with his fishing license from the State of Texas, dated August 13, 1970; fee: $2.15. In a rear room, spread out on a shelving unit, are layers of pulp paperbacks, which I suspect could never live up to the spiciness of their titles and covers: Beat Nymph, Girl Artist, Unfortunate Flesh. Among them, incredibly, was a copy of Grapefruit signed by John and Yoko. Prince looked at it ambivalently, “Yeah,” he said, “this should probably go upstairs.”

When Prince opens the safe upstairs housing his collection of true rarities, there’s initially rather little to see. The books and manuscripts are in custom-made black leather clamshell boxes, their titles stamped in gold on the spines. What’s inside sets the mind and pulse reeling: a copy of Roots inscribed to Buckminster Fuller, an uncorrected proof of Michael Herr’s Dispatches once owned by Hunter S. Thompson, a copy of Catch-22 inscribed to Joseph Heller’s daughter.

A book lover must positively swoon. I can now say I’ve handled Nabokov’s own two-volume Olympia Press edition of Lolita, with his handwritten corrections. And I’ve very nearly handled some Pynchon letters from the early ’60s, by which I mean I’ve held the plastic folder containing them, getting close enough to read his address on Third Street, Manhattan Beach, though Prince asked me not to reveal the recipient.

I’ve also touched some Kerouac marvels—Prince owns a great many. His letters to Neal Cassady, Visions of Cody inscribed to Cassady, various versions of On the Road, advance and review copies and one inscribed to his sister. There’s also a copy signed “to my Buddy Steve”—that’s Steve Allen—and this very book is the one that sits atop the piano in the famous television interview. Alas, I didn’t get to see the scroll manuscript of Big Sur: It was out at the bindery.

There is a strange, and it seems to me admirable, alchemy at work here. Art-market wealth is being transmuted into literary wealth. Of course, it’s an unequal transformation. All the power is on the art side. Prince’s painting Millionaire Nurse sold in 2008 for $4.7 million. However, as Prince has become ever more collectible, he has become ever more of a collector.

“Sometimes,” he told me, “it seems like this collection of mine is too good to be in private hands. It should be in somewhere like the Morgan Library.” In fact, he’s already negotiating to donate it to the Morgan if they let him have an exhibition there for a couple of years. He also has plans to make a catalogue-cum–artist’s book.

“Sometimes,” he said, “I think a catalogue of the collection would be enough for me. I’d still be able to look at it.” But, I suggested, he wouldn’t be able to touch and smell it, rearrange it, and do all those other things that collectors do. “That’s true,” he admitted, though I didn’t sense he’d find that any great problem. “Collecting like this is a full-time hobby,” he said. “And I have other things I want to do.”

Wednesday, September 17, 2008

"Count backwards from 100...."



This is the way the internet works. This is the way information flows here in the 21st Century.

A Bob Dylan fan, I was looking around on the web site, Expecting Rain (if you like Dylan you should click on that and bookmark it) and was looking at the responses to a thread I'd started earlier.

That thread, "She's got everything she needs...." looked at Dylan's influence on the culture by watching it filter down to people like us. I listed 15 or so Youtube videos in which people with guitars recorded themselves performing Dylan's "She Belongs To Me." The versions ranged from very good to very not.

I do a version myself; I came up with this odd way of playing it, fretting it from the top, like a dulcimer. My friend Jeff, who is learning to play guitar, asked me if he could videotape me playing a few songs he wanted to learn. A few days later he told me he'd put a couple of them up on Youtube.

I have arrived.

And I digress.

I snuck my own performance in toward the bottom of the list on that thread and wondered if anyone would find it.

No one did. But one post claimed, "If you want to see something really brilliant..." and posted a link to Peter Bradshaw's film blog at the UK paper, The Guardian who wrote that he was alerted to the video by Philip French of The Observer.

And so it goes.

Bradshaw writes:

The quest for the greatest ever clip on YouTube is over! With tears of emotion, I have watched "100 Movies, 100 Quotes, 100 Numbers." It is an inspired collage, lasting nine minutes and 28 seconds, composed of tiny movie-clips, with fragments of dialogue, simply quoting every number in countdown from 100 to 1: a mind-blowing effort of archive research, somehow trivial and monumental at the same time. The effect is brilliant, hilarious, even weirdly moving. The final ten clips have a tension and a crescendo of their own, as you try to guess what they're going to be. I should have sussed the final one, but I didn't. It functions as a mini-masterpiece on its own terms and also as the basis of a fantastic pub quiz round, in which contestants have to identify each clip.

Its creator is a Mr Alonzo Mosley who describes himself as a 34-year-old librarian from Jacksonville, Florida. I have already sent him an awestruck fanmail through the YouTube site. Let's hope the meanies who work in copyright law do not put the mockers on this because it is so fantastic. I have been watching it on a continuous loop all day. Stop what you're doing and watch it right now! This is why the internet was invented!